REPOSTING OF THE TITLE & EXCERPTS FROM THE APOLOGY THAT WAS LONG IN THE MAKING (Additional Updatee Dates are Below)

The reposting of the post TITLE (from the Conservery Historical Blog) "THE APOLOGY THAT WAS LONG IN THE MAKING" with the below excerpts ONLY is being carried out for the cause of attempting to redress a wrong against another, especially when decades have elapsed and it becomes almost impossible to carry out the correct action. It's intended for a remorseful lady whose residence was my student abode for many years (as the below excerpt indicates), who has now taken steps to implement what's needed, in the hope that what was initiated & intended by her will be completed successfully.

Introduction:

 



Not only was Mrs. Rawlins in attendance at my 1982 wedding to my former spouse as the above linked ALBUM documents, but she was also my invited guest at the TCI Graduation on August 14, 1980 as depicted in the previously linked post and documented in the paragraph three (3) of the post THE ACQUAINTANCE WHOSE FRIENDSHIP WAS UNEXPECTEDLY CONSISTENT (EDITED W/INSERTS (4/1/2019). Furthermore, because her home was my residence for much of the duration while I was a student, the Canon GL111 camera by default, was documented and etched among her possessions as # 18 (as described in the post THE CHANGES THAT FOILED THE "BLACKOUT"!

REPOSTING OF THE REVISED COMMENT #3 FROM MARCH 6, 2013 FROM THE POST "THE DECISION TO ATER MY RETURN TO MY HOMELAND AT THIS TIME" - (UPDATED & AMENDED DATES ARE BELOW)

Introduction:
This reposting of this Revised Comment from the (Historical ONLY) Conservery Blog post "THE DECISION TO ALTER MY RETURN TO MY HOMELAND AT THIS TIME - EDITED AND UPDATED" is being carried out in support of the cause of RESPECT FOR OTHERS. When consistent clarity is being communicated there should be no mistaking it, however, in the times we are living in as indicated in the lead-in to the previous post REPOSTING OFTHE POST EXAMPLES OF COURAGE there is definitely a serious deficiency in this area in our society. As an outcome of this type of "deep-rooted" clarity, respect for others will become the norm instead of what superficially passes for "all is well here", when anything but such takes place for the "undesired" by those who have made themselves out to be the "lords" of the society we live in. Please follow below.

Background/Details of Importance (for COMMENT #3 from March 6, 2013):
One thing I have learned and have tried to live by is to command respect in my undertakings, if you act in a manner that communicates to others, that your processes, guidelines, your records and ultimately you as a people can be disrespected there is no bigger hole than you can dig for yourself, because there is nowhere left to hide. Respect is due all, and one should not be timid in communicating that message because if you cannot go to the into the processes of those expecting you to treat your uniqueness with disdain, and ask them to do what is being expected of you; then they should not be expecting such from you, it’s that simple. This simple rule is how my professionally life has been always patterned starting as a customs and Excise officer, when others carry themselves with disrespect and participate in the same types of conduct that they were there to prevent I chose differently and it resulted in respect for me in the activity for, which my presence was there to uphold, because scurrying could be heard when venturing out into the shed from the office area where the cargo was housed and one day one of the office workers commented, you know the shed workers are afraid of you, you are not like some of the others, they teat you with respect unlike others and I have not shied away from that pattern even today. If hired to implement environmental qualification criteria, I did just that in a manner that brought respect professionally, not love for me as an individual because allowances were made for those with whom I had to interact to treat my area of responsibility as though it didn’t matter so that they could implement anything in the field, it just was not the way conduct for what was being represented by me stood for and just as a less than proper respect was not associated with my conduct in the Bridgetown port as a Customs and Excise officer with responsibility for proper collections of duties; likewise I did not conduct myself in this manner in the nuclear plant in Iowa in my area of responsibility in any other manner than would not reflect the proper implementing of the Program criteria that was needed to ensure the health and safety of the public in case of a loss of coolant accident, because of the knowledge of what was ethically needed and it was implemented accordingly because of my training. Mine was not the career of an individual given to sign off on anything brought before me to approve because I was placed in a position for, which my qualification skills did not match what was needed to ensure proper implementation that would force me to sign whatever came before me because I felt obligated and didn’t know any better; on the contrary, in spite of all the targeted Information Notices that ”coincidentally’’ effected my area during my tenure (see the post ONE TOO MANY "COINCIDENCES" - THE FINALE UPDATED! involving problems that some in the very plant (who knew where all the bodies were buried) were aware of, but chose to use the regulatory agencies to bring them out to address (to make my life difficult), because they themselves either knew not how to or chose not to because of an awareness that such programmatic Guidelines didn't contribute to "a single megawatt at the facility" (specifically from those "Plant" types whose role it was to implement the Regulatory criteria), otherwise they would have taken care of the problems, and/or chose to turn a very "blind eye" to such for, which they were fined $50.000.00 on two different occasions to force management to address the Programmatic criteria, and it was for that cause that resulted in my being hired (10/5a&b/2018).

Overriding Objective:
Even though during my tenure I was not permitted to do anything other than that specific function (by design), I left the Program in much better shape than it was found in at the time of my hiring because of the awareness of what ws needed and the vision to carry out my area of responsibility according to the required Guidelines in a professional manner regardless of whether or not I was "liked" as an individual because this approach commanded respect for the Process for, which I was the primary standard bearer. If in the process of fulfilling my responsibilities, there was anything I knew did not meet the Program requirements, my signature was NOT affixed to the activity simply put until such deficiencies were addressed accordingly.
It is never too late to command respect for your processes (as is taking place in a very significant way in the Country of my upbringing) in a manner in my opinion that causes their citizens to be proud to be identified with their Country.

Conclusion:
If you demonstrate respect for your processes others will also & this will transmit the message loud & clear that our processes aren't "for sale" to those who are of the opinion that they can only "befriend" you when they need something implemented in a manner that shows complete disrespect for your area of responsibility with regards your unique country, because such types typically are not playing by the rules they expect you to “condone”. When you show that there is respect on your part for the processes for, which you are responsible others will be forced to do the same and treat your area of responsibility as they would like you to treat theirs, after all that is only fairness!  

REPOSTING OF THE POST EXAMPLES OF COURAGE - UPDATED 10/4/2017

For the cause of intrinsic change, the following edited post from the Conservery (Historical Blog) EXAMPLES OF COURAGE - UPDATED is being reposted to underscore what truly conveys meaningful and worthwhile, etc. to anyone. Such a "posture" should at a minimum reflect that "business" or affairs aren't being carried out as usual and instead one that inherently conveys respect for others is. In my opinion, this represents a manner that definitely distinguishes from what typically takes place in our society. When its state is so "toxic" that there is no CONSISTENTLY, CLEAR, MORAL EXAMPLE & only ONE (1) Overcomer stands apart from those in these existing Dominions and "starting over" is needed; then a different approach is required in order for REAL CHANGE to take place (3/31/2019)! 

Introduction:
Courage is described by Webster as mental or moral strength to venture, persevere and withstand danger, fear or difficulty and sometimes we tend to forget what it takes to act honorably in the face of tyranny, and even fairly instead of following the “whatever works” examples of cheering crowds urging us to do what’s expedient when we possess each and everyone, the ability to rise above mediocrity and chart a different path than the throngs that have gone before us have done and to set a different example for those after. However, instead of rising to the occasion, most take the “low” road to achieve a less than notable outcome and leave an opportunity that was before them no better than when placed in a position to make a difference; for example, if in the life of a very, very young offspring that was entrusted in one's care, the choice was made to expose that young life to very, adult type action at a morally reprehensible age, for acceptance, and to be counted the same as all else, that would certainly NOT be displaying courageous action. This is an account of selected examples of those who when faced with certain circumstances, acted courageously, in the opinion of this Blogger, please follow.


Here are the Background Details:
Follow these selected examples for lessons from, which we can all learn from today, in no specific order:

1. In 1776, the history of the U.S. A. records the actions of Founding Fathers and fellow Colonists in the original thirteen (13) Colonies when faced with “taxation without representation” took a courageous stand and declared their independence from Britain, not knowing how they would achieve that eventual outcome but defied the “Power” of the day and said this is unfair and eventually the desired outcome/objective was achieved. As takes place in such circumstances, when the process with its high ideals was enacted, they (the young Nation seekers) did not have the end written for them, but along the way they were assisted from unlikely sources, for example: France who joined in their cause and without whose assistance victory would not have been achieved in the manner that it was and not to be forgotten, the assistance of Native (or First) Americans who showed the Colonists how to survive when the “Power” of the day resorted (as such usually do) to ruthless methods to crush the “upstarts” seeking “FAIRNESS”.
2. In 1961 Errol Walton Barrow, Premier of Barbados, sought to obtained independence from the Colonial Power through negotiation and in leading his centuries old Colony, (even sometimes called “little England” because in some circumstances the colonists there, historically were considered to be even more "British" than the Colonial "Power"), and in the end of these negotiations, he came away with the desired “independence” sought to allow his island nation to be counted among the countries of the day, now celebrated every November 30^th and became its first Prime Minister as was started on that first independence in 1966. His nation felt, full of pride as he achieved a notable undertaking that united the entire Country. He convinced the Colonial power that it was in their best interest to give the island its right to chart it’s own course for the future, a right entitled by all that is often lost today by those who seek easy answers to difficult fiscal issues and to engage in tried and “true” old revenue sources (regardless of how reprehensible they are a society’s deep-seated values) and instead of seeking how to achieve the outcome needed by a paradigm shift they follow the same old pathways to the detriment of others who dare stand in their way and/or those whose lives are targeted for achieving the morally debase outcome.
3. Likewise in 1947, Mohandas Gandhi, also sought independence from the Colonial power, through his famous non-violent approach, it was a process that was not easy and took approximately twenty-seven (27) years from the time he told his fellow countrymen to spin cloth for their own clothes instead of purchasing it from the Colonial power. He too did not know how his script would end, but he chose to persevere even in his native attire when granted the right to address those who symbolize the “ halls of power”, because he didn’t see it as inferior to present himself as he saw himself (or his fellow countrymen saw him). He also wanted the “Powerbrokers” to realize that he, more importantly did not see himself any less significant because his national attire was different from those he sought to achieve “liberty” for his people from, and he succeeded.
4. What if the “Gipper” in 1979 had said three times was enough and decided that three (3) tries was sufficient, I am going to be too old to attempt to capture the highest elected office in the land, and had decided not to try, but he did not take the easy road, into a life of ease on the ranch, but chose instead to seek higher office “one more time” and in his fourth attempt, he found success even being elected at age 69. Had he chosen not to persevere, he would have lost his opportunity to (against his own Staff’s recommendation) call on the then Soviet Union to “tear down these walls” and challenge them on many levels (for example economically and militarily) that in many ways led to the collapse of a dying system. He chose to follow the path of his boyhood hero and took a courageous stand when he needed to, that defied the conventional wisdom and his actions are recorded in history and discussed about, what type of impact they had, etc., but in the end they cannot deny that when his moment came, the “Gipper” chose to be different instead of expediency and left a fitting example to learn from.
5. Accordingly, what if Susan B. Anthony had decided that women will never be allowed to vote, even though it’s unfair. She didn’t choose expediency, but instead decided to work hard at trying to eliminate a very unjust system against women of her day, such that she laid the groundwork for the eventual passing of Adult Suffrage laws that occurred in 1920, eighteen (18) years after her passing, showing that her cause, even though not achieved in her lifetime, was not in vain. This is an invaluable lesson, for our society that believes in now, today, easily obtained “credibility” at the expense of those who worked hard to achieve their accomplishments only to have them “snatched” away by "Johnny-come-lately” types seeking a “free ride” with no meaningful skills but only possessing the willingness to subject themselves to whatever sordid acts are required of them for the “easy” lifestyles they seek in exchange for contributing very little to the detriment of society, because it often leads to younger and younger adolescents either being lured and/or kidnapped and placed in such situations due to circumstances way beyond their control by those with questionable lifestyle choices and then being willing to either subject and/or being forced into circumstances, which result in them participating in the same types of adult type actions at earlier and earlier ages either by hapless or "weakened" parents and guardians or callous types who place the young lives they have been entrusted with into such a disgusting world and ensuing "cloak and dagger" lifestyle of "fleeting" and superficial "fame and fortune", which in reality is an illusion, because there is nothing "fortunate" about being "robbed" of one's childhood no matter how much trappings of "success" are wrapped around those who find themselves "trapped" in such lifestyles and the shame that comes with being forced to be a parent when a mere adolescent and a child oneself, it must be a demoralizing situation for a mere adolescent to find herself in at the hands of callous adults who think nothing "sinister" about such activity than to remove the young lives produced in such circumstances and set the victimized back to "work" in a "vicious looping" set of circumstances from. which there is seemingly no escape (see the post “HOW YOUNG IS TOO YOUNG (EDITED)?”) as well as THE LOOP THAT CAUSE TOO MUCH OF A "GOOD" THING TO GO BAD! for a discussion on the perils of even unplanned "looping" actions.
6. The final example is from the Bible and it centers around the story of a LADY who when faced with the unfair actions others were confronted with, that most certainly could have wiped out an entire generation, chose to act honorably even when to do so meant being in an unscripted situation (3/31/2019). This is the Biblical account of Queen Esther and what confronted the Queen in trying to save others, who could have easily have chosen to seek personal safety and silence for the cause of self-preservation but decided against it and rose courageously to seek “FREEDOM FOR ALL - UPDATED!” not just doing what was expedient only. By taking this stand, Esther's life first of all was placed in grave danger in identifying with those who had been sentence to death. Next  convention was defied by making this stand known in a situation when that dared not risk such an action for, which the King could have sealed the Queen's fate, but decided that the cause was greater than personal safety and challenged the existing convention and gained the freedom for all from the King who didn't fully comprehend the action he had subjected an entire race of individuals too.                                 

The Implications and Lessons to be Learned:
These above examples depict individuals, who each in their own right exemplified Webster description in one manner or another and while each of us may not be placed in circumstances that could have been as significant in the same respect as the above individuals; however, if we examine our lives we may find that our responsibility may involve some action we may think is meaningless, but actually involves molding a young life to years of meaningful activity instead of a skill less existence from, which few seldom escape, On the other hand, your area of responsibility may involve making the decision about whether or not to seek to undo years of wrongdoing implemented by others against one who was undeserving of the treatment meted out to him by those with long-term objectives of seeking to implement a new pathway into a former colony with perpetual-wealth generation at its core, with the aid of those who would benefit financially from this new scheme how will you choose, to stand courageously or to follow the path of others before, who lacked the type of courage to say no to the former Colonial “power” and its supporters. The area with, which you maybe confronted, could very well be to lend a helping hand to another that wasn’t about yourself. On occasion, we may be confronted with a scenario in, which that what another may be seeking, is in your possession and/or within your power to provide but how should you proceed is the challenge, when actions taken by such may have caused injury or even pain how do you respond? Do you respond in kind or do you take the “higher” road. This is certainly not an easy situation to be confronted with and should expediency rule the day or should a course of daring to be different be charted. The answer lies only within the individual faced with such an eventuality, because we often do not know the motivation of others and whether or not genuine assistance is required. However, one can never be faulted for offering something within your possession to provide when all else says to “slam the door”. In the end it may indeed turn out that by offering, the would be seeker knowing their cause is unjust may take the less shameless path and refuse to place such a situation before someone wronged, however one never knows and the way forward is often strewn with tough choices. The main point being made here is this, even though our actions may not be seen as earth shattering as helping to obtain world peace, even in a small way what our contributions entail may very well be the type of action that could assist in molding the life of a real hero by the choices we make even when not realizing how significant they are to another individual. Courageous actions may not always be readily apparent but when given the choice to offer input from another seeking it, the outcome should be given much careful thought because it may be that your very action could be the helping hand in the life of a very deserving individual, which is in your “power” to assist and maybe just a little less focusing on what is in for "me" may be the real test of whether or not you acted with courage when it really mattered (even if it requires going against the established path taken by predecessors for gain), for one can never tell how life’s tests come to us, often when we least expect it and for, which some grandiose scheme may have been sought but events just did not materialize in that fashion. How we act in the smaller matters, will in turn determine how or even if we are indeed worthy of being placed in situations requiring more burdensome challenges.

The Outcome:
Courageous action is not always readily apparent is the point being made in closing and it would behoove us to examine our actions with great care when confronted with situations unexpectedly because no one knows the future and the best laid plans that took decades to compile can be unraveled in an instant. Egypt’s former dictator can attest to that as you seek to address the challenges before you, I hope with ”food for thought”, considering all the options (not just those expedient types) but carefully and methodically ALL because this is the only fair way to proceed in all circumstances, you can never tell if your response may be courageous in the life of a deserving individual, and that would have been worth it. Often it is difficult to tell if by some small action you are assisting in a larger plan in, which your input may appear to be small but really significant in the end, that’s why fairness should be our most important motto! See the post EXAMPLES OF COURAGE - AMENDED AND EDITED for the post that concludes the discussion of this subject, which focuses on the type of courageousness that is required for the preservation of the collective uniqueness (of for example a state), and not permitting those criteria (such as self determination processes that can have far reaching implications) that define a state's unique citizenry to be dissected, disrespected, disregarded and shown disdain for by those only concerned with the furtherance of their own selfish objectives at the expense of all else (regardless of whose policies, or individual's rights as well as  specific states rights are sacrificed along the way, and who in turn wouldn't tolerate similar reciprocal action by the same states whose processes are trampled over rudely - see  the post THE PREMISE BEHIND THE "FLAWED" LEGISLATION - UPDATED. It is in reality a unique call for that rare form of collective courageousness needed to be demonstrated in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds at the hands of those that disguise their true intentions while pursuing age old pursuits (methods) at obtaining perpetual wealth-generation, disrespectfully and the successful example used by the early American colonists should be carefully studied for the overall implications of the lessons to be learned, such as office holders with "unity of purpose around a specific cause" etc., (even if the exact methods can't be copied) but the associated principles can be applied and used appropriately, as described in the post A CLOSER LOOK AT AN UNUSUAL FORM OF EXEMPLIFIED COURAGE (EDITED AND UPDATED). 
What these perpetrators don't realize is that ONE knew of their plans because only He knows the future and it was recorded, even down to the awarding of 1st Amendment free "speech" rights as documented in the post "WHO REALLY WAS GRANTED THE FREEDOM TO SPEAK?" to the "free loader" types to provide them with a form of "legitimacy" to pursue their corrupt, useless and skill less practices of income generation in their performance of doing very little in exchange for "much" at the expense of those who have been victimized along the way and whose rights and lives sacrificed for what, a very demeaning form of lifestyle and existence (see the post WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED BY DECREE - UPDATED), for examples of those whose lives have been tragically sacrificed surgically, and covered-up with carefully re-arranged replacements of a certain depiction as deemed appropriate by those of their cause; but permitted for the journey and molding of "His chosen" for this time as documented in the post GOD'S DIRECTION IN THE LIVES OF HIS CHOSEN - UPDATED. The fact that these developments were previously recorded in Revelation chapter 13, verse 15, in part, centuries ago, in addition to other sections that appropriately, if time is taken to read the ensuing developments, for those of "His chosen" with "understanding"* (see FOOTNOTE #1) who are truly seeking meaning in today's developments in our society that has truly lost its way and is in free fall, which the language in the final book of the Biblical account, with its altered language depicts, that has to be handled carefully because like most historical works, editions as well as additions have served the purpose of obscuring the real intent of much of its content, ) that accurately documented the type of fate that dictators ALL suffer* (see FOOTNOTE), which should be "food for thought" for those intent on "FORCING" their will on others considered of little consequence, by such "entitled" types, who sadly never appear to learn from the mistakes of others of their type. Ultimately, however, ONE alone is in control when it comes to the events in the lives of His chosen and He will not permit the plans of such types to impact His will for His chosen! 

* FOOTNOTE:
For additional discussion about The Types of Eventualities That Bring Down Dictators see The Finale/Outcome section of the post THE FATE OF DICTATORS WHO HOLD ON TOO LONG- UPDATED.
 
* FOOTNOTE # 1:
The subject of understanding is more carefully described in the post WISDOM, UNDERSTANDING AND KNOWLEDGE -  INSTRUMENTS FOR LIFE - UPDATED AND AMENDED 

REPOSTING OF SHOOT FIRST AND ASK NO QUESTIONS AFTERWARDS!

This Cosvry Summary Blog post SHOOT FIRST AND ASK NO QUESTIONS AFTERWARDS! is being reposted for the cause of the Cash Register Attendant at the focus of that post, Elizabeth Lamberti & sibling's very, very near kin, dear Jessica, who went missing & has not been seen or heard from since around mid August. It is my hope that these two siblings as well as the others in Elizabeth's family will be comforted & that this development doesn't become another lengthy missing without a trace saga!
 
The Conservery Blog original SHOOT FIRST AND ASK NO QUESTIONS AFTERWARDS! as this summary post focuses on the developments surrounding my encounter at a local establishment and the outcome, which shows how easily individuals can be labeled, taken for granted and rights violated without concern for what's the best approach to achieve the correct outcome in any given situation, (especially when making decisions that have potentially very far-reaching implications).  

REPOSTING OF AN EXCERPT FROM THE POST THE LOOP THAT CAUSED TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING TO GO BAD - UPDATED 11/26/2017

This excerpt from the Conservery Blog post THE LOOP THAT CAUSED TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING TO GO BAD - UPDATED is being done for the cause of ONLINE (& ALL OTHER) IT-BASED SYSTEMS THAT AREN'T BEING MISUSED BY THOSE WHO USE SUCH METHODS.


Introduction:
This follow-up to the previous post “WHEN TOO MUCH OF A “GOOD” THING IS BAD!” is intended to document and quantify in a blow-by-blow account, the series of events that contributed to the mayhem that marred the SN Leader’s NASDAQ IPO as documented in that Daily/Weekend Business Street Publication from May 21, 2012.

Here are the Details:

1.    The central issue that occurred was a malfunction in the trading-systems’ design for processing order cancellations that occurred, which all the extensive testing ahead of the IPO failed to unearth.

2.    The malfunction resulted in a 30-minute delay in trading in the SN Leader’s shares and left NASDAQ indicating that is was planning a redesign of the IPO system, which current and former NASDAQ officials summarized as follows: “this isn’t our finest hour” and “this isn’t good for trust”. The timeline for these developments were as described below:

3.     Around 11:00 am, NASDAQ announced that there would be a 5-minute delay in the IPO, (which in itself is not abnormal). 

4.     However, 5 minutes came and went and no announcement was made about when the IPO would commence and at that point anxiety stared to build.

5.     Later NASDAQ indicated that it encountered a problem it hadn’t anticipated, relating matching up buy and sell orders to pinpoint the price of the first trade and as a result, it took 5 million seconds instead of 3 million seconds that it typically takes for such actions to complete.

6.     Compounding these problems were anxious traders who not being able get confirmation of their orders started canceling, which resulted in a domino effect that interfered with the process and caused it to reset. As a result, of this series of events, a loop was created that took NASDAQ officials 20 minutes to resolve and then set the stock to open at 11:30 am.

7.     This 30-minute glitch affected approximately 30 million shares and those who had attempted to place trades during that period didn’t find out the status of those transactions until 1:50 pm.  

The Outcome and Future Outlook:

This “black eye” for the NASDAQ OMX Group, didn’t help bolster their reputation as the center for such tech IPO deals as they had competed fiercely with rival NYSE Euronex for the chance to have this listing and has left the officials promising a complete redesign of its IPO systems and tried to highlight the outcome, namely the amount of investment funds raised overall. In addition, it has left a host of questions about how Wall Street carries out one of its most basic functions, raising capital for young companies, since this was the second technical “issues-filled” public offering in recent months for a major stock exchange boasting sophisticated electronic-trading systems (at the time of the article’s publication). The first was the BATS Global IPO that was botched on its own exchange, the BATS Global Markets that occurred in March 2012 that was blamed on a software glitch. These developments underscore the fact that regardless of how “well” prepared we may be, unanticipated developments can cause the best-laid plans to result in mayhem, because none of the NASDAQ’s pre-testing preceding the IPO revealed the problem that occurred that resulted in the loop. A loop in “software” circles is to be avoided at all costs, because when a loop is accessed it results in a continuous cycling action from, which escape is very difficult especially if not planned. As the SN Leader’s IPO fiasco demonstrated that there is a significant difference between a planned versus an unplanned loop in software as these tech self described “nerds” are very familiar with, which in itself adds irony to these undertakings. For a software-related glitch, (which an unplanned loop action can be described as), to circumvent (or “upend”) the “well planned” lPO (or big moment) of this “specific” “nerd” who in my opinion thought like the character on that Titanic movie that he was “on top of the world” in this Blogger’s opinion, at least when I was an active FB user before closing my presence there; must have been a “blow” to “his perception of himself”. I wonder if the wedding was really planned or if it was hastily thrown together to deflect from the fiasco? because the picture released appeared as if the two participants just decided to get married as a matter of fact (or better yet, after the fact). This is what these types of individuals who are accustomed to getting their way (or who have been led to believe that they can do whatever they choose), implement when events do not work out as expected, they plan pseudo events to keep their perception of themselves in the public’s “eye”. When we start to believe all the things (“praise”) others are just “lavishing” on us who are typically after some favor, rather than (accept who we are rather than assume the "complete background" of others and be "open-minded" enough to conclude that significant accomplishments can be undertaken by others and "I" don't have to "take over" everything belonging to another that "I" desire to make my "kingdom" larger and larger while pretending to be "all knowing"), such that "I" then have to resort to “publicity driven” events to “manage” those outcomes that don’t work out to show how “magnificent” "I" am; maybe this could then be a starting point for the development of "REAL" progress respecting others, the way in, which God intended as documented in the Conclusion section of the post THE AMENDMENT TO HONORING GOD AND RESPECTING OTHERS, PRACTICALLY - UPDATED. Furthermore, when complicated processes are planned, or are involved there are many avenues for unanticipated developments to take place and cause chaos to take place instead of the routine planned, similar to the circumstances those plant operators faced on March 28, 1979 [as documented in the post, NO INDIVIDUAL KNOWS THE FUTURE (EDITED)], and this should cause us to be mindful of the fact that everything and the lives of every individual can't be manipulated and managed to suite the whims of other individuals, less we forget that the proper balance is for us to be honoring God and respecting others instead of what takes place today, dishonoring God and disrespecting others as a NORMAL part of conducting business and the packaging such avenues of conducting business and duplicating them to enlarge our "empires", regardless of the manner in, which the income is derived as documented in the Conclusion section of the post FINDING CONTRIBUTORS FOR A MOGUL'S CHARITY, UPDATED.